Hiring
Most hiring debates overweight charm and underweight work samples. Argumont compares named options, including 'do not hire yet,' against criteria you can defend...
use case
Compare candidates against the work, not the room
Candidate comparison is distorted by charisma. Argumont holds work samples, references, and the option to wait on the same criteria.
Not hiring is on the table
An empty seat can beat a wrong hire. If urgency is manufacturing the decision, say so as a risk, not as a hidden criterion.
Related pages
Which candidate?
A hire is a decision with a long tail: ramp time, team load, and the cost of being wrong. Scoring after you already like someone is not scoring.
Decision bias
Confirmation bias, sunk cost, authority bias, and recency show up in almost every material choice. Process is how you make them more expensive to indulge.
Use cases
A use case is a job: challenge, compare, research, test. It is not the same as a decision type. Pricing can use several of these jobs.
Compare hiring options
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Compare hiring options