Challenge my idea
Challenge My Idea is for when you already have a preferred plan and need it tested. Argumont does not exist to decorate that plan with supportive language.
hub
Features of a decision product, not a chatbot skin
Each feature page describes something the product actually does, including limits. Team sharing beyond a private workspace is called out as future work.
Start with the job
Most people want Challenge, Compare, or Find a Better Option. Scoring, evidence, and appeals sit underneath those jobs.
In this cluster
Compare options
When you already have two or more serious alternatives, Compare Options keeps the contest on criteria rather than on which story is more charismatic.
Find a better option
A trivial variant of your plan is not an alternative. This flow is for forcing a serious search, then scoring what is found against the original.
Evidence verification
A source listed in a paragraph is not a verified fact. Argumont keeps an evidence status on material claims so unsupported numbers cannot hide as certainty.
Claim analysis
Most strategy documents mix five kinds of statement. Argumont labels them so an assumption cannot survive as a fact because it was formatted in bold.
Risk analysis
Argumont treats risk as something you can score alongside other criteria. Volume of imagined disasters is not the same as residual risk after a mitigation.
Decision scoring
Argumont scores options against criteria you can inspect. Weights are explicit. Reasons are stored. A model agreeing with itself is not a score.
Decision confidence
Argumont reports confidence as a property of the analysis, not as enthusiasm. Missing evidence and contested claims should pull it down.
Decision appeals
After a verdict, you can run an appeal that assumes the conclusion failed. That is a different job from asking the same analysis to try again with nicer words.
Outcome tracking
A verdict without an outcome is a bet you never graded. Argumont lets you mark what actually occurred against the original decision.
Decision history
Each decision in Argumont keeps its analysis and later steps together. That is the product's memory. It is not a public page and not a dump of every token.
Decision graph
A graph in Argumont is there so you can see which claims support which scores. If a node is load-bearing and unverified, that should be obvious.
Team decisions
People search for team decision software because they want a shared record. Argumont already keeps that record inside a workspace. Broader multi-player editing ...
Research
Argumont research exists to support or attack claims inside a decision. It is not a generic report writer, and it should not fabricate citations.
Multi-model analysis
Argumont can involve more than one model. That helps when roles disagree. It does not mean five fluent answers have become a fact.
How it works
The product is a sequence, not a conversation that hopes to end well. Each step leaves something you can inspect.
Pricing
You pay for structured runs, not for a box of tokens to paste into a chat. Exact credit amounts are configured server-side and shown in the product.
See how it works
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
See how it works