Claim analysis
Most strategy documents mix five kinds of statement. Argumont labels them so an assumption cannot survive as a fact because it was formatted in bold.
feature
See how the argument is connected
A graph in Argumont is there so you can see which claims support which scores. If a node is load-bearing and unverified, that should be obvious.
What to look for
Claims that many scores depend on, evidence that is missing, and alternatives that were never connected to a criterion.
What it is not
It is not a knowledge-graph product for the public web. It is a view on one private decision.
Related pages
Argument evaluation
A good argument has a claim, a warrant, and evidence. Evaluation asks whether those pieces connect, not whether the paragraph sounds smart.
Decision scoring
Argumont scores options against criteria you can inspect. Weights are explicit. Reasons are stored. A model agreeing with itself is not a score.
Consultants
Advisory work is often delivered as a polished answer. Clients increasingly ask how the answer was tested. Argumont is a way to show the opposition, not only th...
Features
Each feature page describes something the product actually does, including limits. Team sharing beyond a private workspace is called out as future work.
Inspect a decision graph
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Inspect a decision graph