Claim analysis
Most strategy documents mix five kinds of statement. Argumont labels them so an assumption cannot survive as a fact because it was formatted in bold.
learn
A vivid story is not a warrant
A good argument has a claim, a warrant, and evidence. Evaluation asks whether those pieces connect, not whether the paragraph sounds smart.
What it means
Debate training helps. So does a checklist: what is asserted, what would disprove it, what source is cited, what is missing.
Why it matters
Decisions fail when a vivid story outruns a weak warrant. Evaluation slows that down long enough to notice.
How to apply it
Break memos into claims. Score each. The remaining narrative is what is left after the weak claims fall.
A common trap
Marking an argument strong because you agree with the conclusion.
How Argumont uses this
Claims are first-class objects with types and evidence status. You can inspect them instead of rereading a transcript.
Related pages
Evidence-based decisions
The phrase is used in medicine and public policy. In business it means you can point to a source when you say a number or a causal story, and you label what you...
Challenge my idea
This workflow exists for the moment you already believe something is best. Argumont does not start from a blank brainstorm. It starts from your proposal and tri...
Assumption testing
Every plan sits on unstated ifs. Testing means you write them, rank them by how much they would change the decision, and gather evidence on the top few.
Learn
These articles explain methods Argumont uses in the product. They are education, not a pile of keyword stubs, and not fake news with invented dates.
Evaluate claims
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Evaluate claims