The Verdict is not the end of the record.

After acting on a Decision, the user can record whether the result was successful, partially successful, unsuccessful, or too early to evaluate.

The Outcome belongs beside the original Verdict.

It should not replace it.

Hindsight can make the past look obvious.

Argumont should preserve what was known, assumed, disputed, and uncertain when the original Verdict was produced.

The Outcome records what happened afterward.

Over time, Outcomes can show which assumptions failed, which risks materialized, which evidence proved useful, where confidence was misplaced, and where uncertainty was correctly preserved.

The Verdict is Argumont's analytical judgment.

The Human Decision is what the authorized human or organization chose.

Outcome is what happened in reality.

Those states should not collapse into one another.

For organizations, Decision history can become a record of what was considered, why one option won, which concerns remained, what the organization chose, and what happened afterward.

That is more useful than reconstructing an old meeting from messages and memory.

A strong analytical process cannot guarantee the world will cooperate.

A Verdict is an analytical conclusion based on the record available at the time.

Outcome is what happens later.