hub

Use cases: what you are trying to do

A use case is a job: challenge, compare, research, test. It is not the same as a decision type. Pricing can use several of these jobs.

Start from the job

If you already love an option, challenge it. If you have two serious alternatives, compare them. If you are missing evidence, research. If the plan sits on ifs, test assumptions.

In this cluster

use case

Challenge my idea

This workflow exists for the moment you already believe something is best. Argumont does not start from a blank brainstorm. It starts from your proposal and tri...

use case

Compare options

Comparison work fails when each option is described in a different language. Argumont holds options to the same criteria, then lets you open every score.

use case

Find a better option

Many debates only have two chairs. Argumont's alternative builder is instructed to propose a path that is not a cosmetic rename of A or B.

use case

Research a decision

Some decisions are starved of structure before they are starved of opinions. This workflow researches comparable patterns from general knowledge, then runs the ...

use case

Test assumptions

A plan can look robust while resting on two unverified sentences. Argumont extracts those sentences, classifies them, and keeps them inspectable.

use case

Evaluate a business idea

A business idea is a bundle of product, customer, and cost claims. Argumont unbundles them so a strong story cannot hide a weak mechanism.

use case

Compare pricing models

Flat, seats, usage, and hybrid designs create different failure modes. Argumont scores them on the same criteria so a simple story cannot beat a sounder structu...

use case

Compare suppliers

Supplier comparison is not a price list. Argumont holds quality history, variance in lead time, and dual-source designs on the same scorecard.

use case

Compare software

Software comparison dies in feature matrices. Argumont scores the five workflows that must work, the person who will administer the tool, and whether you can le...

use case

Compare vendors

A vendor is a dependency you will operate, pay, and possibly sue. Argumont compares the shortlist, the incumbent, and delay.

use case

Compare markets

Market comparison fails when TAM is the headline. Argumont scores how the first customers buy, what licenses cost, and whether the core business would be neglec...

use case

Compare candidates

Candidate comparison is distorted by charisma. Argumont holds work samples, references, and the option to wait on the same criteria.

use case

Compare product ideas

Roadmaps fill with objects. Argumont compares the underlying bets: who is in pain, what evidence exists, and what else you cannot ship.

use case

Compare architectures

Architecture comparison is a staffing and incident conversation. Argumont scores correctness, operations, and reversibility, not fashion.

use case

Evaluate risk

Risk work is a decision among mitigate, transfer, accept, and avoid. Argumont keeps residual risk on the page so a funded control cannot pretend to have closed ...

use case

Validate strategy

Strategy validation is not a workshop that ends in posters. Argumont challenges the preferred plan, demands a real alternative, and writes down what would chang...

hub

Features

Each feature page describes something the product actually does, including limits. Team sharing beyond a private workspace is called out as future work.

hub

Decisions

These pages are not a directory of keywords. Each one describes a kind of choice, the evidence it needs, how Argumont scores it, and where to go next.

Open a use case in the product

Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.

Open a use case in the product