Challenge my idea
Challenge My Idea is for when you already have a preferred plan and need it tested. Argumont does not exist to decorate that plan with supportive language.
core
How Argumont runs a decision
The product is a sequence, not a conversation that hopes to end well. Each step leaves something you can inspect.
1. Make your case
State the decision and the option you currently prefer. Argumont treats that option as a contestant. You can also name alternatives and freeze criteria with weights that total 100%.
2. Independent roles work the problem
Advocate, challenger, and alternative roles build competing positions. They are not a group chat. They produce claims.
3. Evidence is tested
Claims are classified as fact, assumption, estimate, prediction, or opinion, then given an evidence status. Data you type is stored as user-confirmed, not independently verified, until a source supports it.
4. Options are scored
Whole-number scores with reasons. Confidence tracks coverage and disagreement, not enthusiasm. A materially different option is required when one exists.
5. Verdict, appeal, outcome
You get a recorded verdict. You can run an independent appeal designed to prove it wrong. After you accept, you can record what actually happened.
Related pages
Decision scoring
Argumont scores options against criteria you can inspect. Weights are explicit. Reasons are stored. A model agreeing with itself is not a score.
Decision appeals
After a verdict, you can run an appeal that assumes the conclusion failed. That is a different job from asking the same analysis to try again with nicer words.
Decision intelligence
Decision intelligence is not a chatbot with a strategy accent. It is the practice of making a choice inspectable: what was compared, what evidence was used, wha...
Run this through Argumont
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Run this through Argumont