Argument evaluation
A good argument has a claim, a warrant, and evidence. Evaluation asks whether those pieces connect, not whether the paragraph sounds smart.
feature
Break the memo into claims you can score
Most strategy documents mix five kinds of statement. Argumont labels them so an assumption cannot survive as a fact because it was formatted in bold.
Claim types
Fact, assumption, estimate, prediction, and opinion. Each can be true or false later. Only facts should be stored as if they were already checked.
Why it matters
Scoring a prediction as if it were a fact is how confident rooms get surprised. The label is the first control.
Related pages
Evidence verification
A source listed in a paragraph is not a verified fact. Argumont keeps an evidence status on material claims so unsupported numbers cannot hide as certainty.
Test assumptions
A plan can look robust while resting on two unverified sentences. Argumont extracts those sentences, classifies them, and keeps them inspectable.
Assumption testing
Every plan sits on unstated ifs. Testing means you write them, rank them by how much they would change the decision, and gather evidence on the top few.
Features
Each feature page describes something the product actually does, including limits. Team sharing beyond a private workspace is called out as future work.
Analyze the claims
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Analyze the claims