hub

Decision types worth treating as decisions

These pages are not a directory of keywords. Each one describes a kind of choice, the evidence it needs, how Argumont scores it, and where to go next.

How to use this cluster

Pick the decision you are actually making. If you are choosing a price, start with pricing, not with a generic strategy essay. Follow related use cases and questions from there.

In this cluster

decision

Business strategy

A strategy decision is a commitment of attention, capital, and time under uncertainty. Argumont treats your preferred plan as one contestant and asks whether a ...

decision

Pricing

A price encodes who you can serve, who you cannot, and whether high-cost users can make the unit economics fail. Argumont scores competing packaging options aga...

decision

Product

Product decisions fail when a preferred feature is treated as the destination. Argumont asks whether the underlying user problem is better solved by a different...

decision

Hiring

Most hiring debates overweight charm and underweight work samples. Argumont compares named options, including 'do not hire yet,' against criteria you can defend...

decision

Technology

Technology decisions are often won by familiarity. Argumont asks whether the preferred stack is actually stronger on correctness, time to value, operations, and...

decision

Cybersecurity

Security work is a sequence of tradeoffs under incomplete information. Argumont compares remediation options against exploitability, impact, exposure, and opera...

decision

Procurement

Vendor selection fails when the RFP theater is mistaken for evidence. Argumont compares suppliers on total cost, switching difficulty, and whether claimed capab...

decision

Branding

Branding decisions collapse when they are run as popularity contests. Argumont compares options on distinctiveness, legal risk, and whether the name can travel.

decision

Marketing

Marketing choices often look decided because a channel is fashionable. Argumont compares spend, sequencing, and the option to stop, using evidence status instea...

decision

Operations

Operations choices look tidy in a memo and messy on a Monday. Argumont compares process changes against disruption, capacity, and whether the new path is staffe...

decision

Investment

Investment decisions are easy to decorate with models. Argumont compares the proposed use of money with doing nothing, delaying, or a different instrument, and ...

decision

Startups

Early companies make irreversible choices while still guessing. Argumont is built for founders who want opposition before they spend the next six months proving...

decision

Vendor selection

Vendor selection is an operations and risk decision wearing a sales process. Argumont compares named vendors, including the incumbent and 'build a thin internal...

decision

Market entry

Market entry fails when 'go' is treated as a single bit. Argumont compares direct entry, partnership, acquisition, and wait, with distribution and regulation ke...

decision

Build vs buy

The slogan hides the real options: build, buy, assemble, or decline the capability. Argumont scores those paths on time to value, lock-in, and operational owner...

decision

Software selection

Buying software is easy to rush because the category feels familiar. Argumont compares tools on the jobs they must do in your workflows, including the option to...

decision

Manufacturing

A manufacturing decision locks tooling, quality, and geography. Argumont compares make, buy, dual-source, and delay, with yield and concentration as first-class...

decision

Supplier selection

Suppliers fail politely in emails and expensively in shortages. Argumont compares named suppliers and dual-source designs against quality, lead time, and concen...

decision

Location selection

Location decisions are slow to reverse and easy to romanticize. Argumont compares sites, remote-first, and delay, with talent and logistics treated as evidence ...

decision

Risk management

A risk register lists worries. A decision chooses a treatment. Argumont compares mitigation, transfer, acceptance, and avoidance with residual risk left visible...

hub

Use cases

A use case is a job: challenge, compare, research, test. It is not the same as a decision type. Pricing can use several of these jobs.

hub

Questions

These pages answer a search the way an operator would: what the question hides, what evidence is needed, and how to run it in Argumont.

Start a Decision

Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.

Start a Decision