decision

Turkey versus Italy is several decisions in one

This is a public educational page, not a customer case and not a recommendation to site a plant. The useful work is naming criteria before a country becomes a brand preference.

What is actually being decided

Unit economics, quality system, lead time, minimum order, logistics, country-of-origin effects, and whether the supplier can hold a process. 'Italy' and 'Turkey' are not scores.

Evidence that matters

Quotes you can audit, defect history, export documentation, and concentration risk. A travel impression is an opinion.

How Argumont would run it

Treat each country-plus-supplier pair as an option. Freeze weights. Mark origin claims as claims. Do not publish a winner here as if we had your SKU.

Related pages

decision

Manufacturing

A manufacturing decision locks tooling, quality, and geography. Argumont compares make, buy, dual-source, and delay, with yield and concentration as first-class...

decision

Supplier selection

Suppliers fail politely in emails and expensively in shortages. Argumont compares named suppliers and dual-source designs against quality, lead time, and concen...

product

Decision Scoring

Argumont creates decision-specific criteria and explicit weights rather than applying one generic scoring framework to every problem.

decision

Single vs dual sourcing

This educational page does not tell you to dual-source. It tells you to put the cost of concentration on the same page as the unit price.

hub

Decision Library

These pages are public educational content. They are not your workspace decisions. Each one describes a kind of choice, the evidence it needs, and how to run it...

Score your actual plants

Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.

Score your actual plants