Supplier selection
Suppliers fail politely in emails and expensively in shortages. Argumont compares named suppliers and dual-source designs against quality, lead time, and concen...
decision
A manufacturing decision locks tooling, quality, and geography. Argumont compares make, buy, dual-source, and delay, with yield and concentration as first-class issues.
You may be choosing a plant, a process, a contract manufacturer, or a transfer of production. The preferred 'simple' plant is one option. A more expensive path with better yield can win.
Unit cost without yield and scrap. A cheap line that wastes material is not cheap.
Another mistake is single-source concentration because the relationship feels personal.
Measured yield, actual lead times, audit results, and shipping variability. Supplier promises should stay unverified until lots have shipped.
What you actually get out of the process.
Including variance, not only the quote.
What happens if that site stops.
Tooling, qualification, and learning loss.
Inventory the option forces you to hold.
The new source is late because quality gates were fantasy.
Factory cost ignores the path to the customer.
Launch in Turkey and scale in China, dual-run, or delay SKU expansion. Geography is a risk category, not a slogan.
Suppliers fail politely in emails and expensively in shortages. Argumont compares named suppliers and dual-source designs against quality, lead time, and concen...
A supplier or plant decision lives in lead time, quality, and concentration. Spreadsheets that ignore qualification time are not analysis.
Supplier comparison is not a price list. Argumont holds quality history, variance in lead time, and dual-source designs on the same scorecard.
These pages are not a directory of keywords. Each one describes a kind of choice, the evidence it needs, how Argumont scores it, and where to go next.
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Compare production options