decision

Supplier choice is a reliability decision

Suppliers fail politely in emails and expensively in shortages. Argumont compares named suppliers and dual-source designs against quality, lead time, and concentration.

What this decision type is

This is procurement with physical consequences. Price per unit is one criterion. Missed lots are another.

The incumbent supplier is an option even if the relationship is strained. Switching is an option with its own defect risk.

Common mistakes

Awarding on unit price, then paying in expedites. The analysis should include the cost of being late.

Another mistake is treating a factory tour as a process audit.

What evidence matters

Lot history, on-time percentages, financial health where you can get it, and the existence of a second qualified source. User-confirmed internal quality data stays labeled as such.

Example criteria

Quality history

Defects and escapes, not brochures.

On-time reliability

Variance, not the promised median.

Concentration risk

How many eggs are in that site.

Switching labor

Qualification time and engineering attention.

Common risks

Relationship fog

Personal trust substitutes for measured performance.

Capacity surprise

The supplier's other customers take the line.

Example decision

Stay with the current supplier, dual-source 30%, or move the whole volume. Dual-source has a real coordination cost.

Related pages

use case

Compare suppliers

Supplier comparison is not a price list. Argumont holds quality history, variance in lead time, and dual-source designs on the same scorecard.

decision

Manufacturing

A manufacturing decision locks tooling, quality, and geography. Argumont compares make, buy, dual-source, and delay, with yield and concentration as first-class...

question

Change suppliers?

A supplier change is not only a unit price. It is qualification time, quality variance, and what happens if the new source fails in month two.

hub

Decisions

These pages are not a directory of keywords. Each one describes a kind of choice, the evidence it needs, how Argumont scores it, and where to go next.

Compare your suppliers

Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.

Compare your suppliers