Adversarial reasoning
Adversarial reasoning is not being difficult in a meeting. It is assigning someone, or a model, the job of breaking the story so you do not ship a hole.
feature
Appeal the verdict as if it were wrong
After a verdict, you can run an appeal that assumes the conclusion failed. That is a different job from asking the same analysis to try again with nicer words.
What an appeal is
An independent pass aimed at reversal. The original record stays. You can see what changed.
When to use it
When the stakes are high, when the first pass felt too kind to your idea, or when new evidence arrived.
Related pages
Challenge my idea
Challenge My Idea is for when you already have a preferred plan and need it tested. Argumont does not exist to decorate that plan with supportive language.
Challenge my idea
This workflow exists for the moment you already believe something is best. Argumont does not start from a blank brainstorm. It starts from your proposal and tri...
Audit trail
Regulators and boards sometimes require a trail. Operators need one even when nobody is asking, because memories of meetings are fiction.
Features
Each feature page describes something the product actually does, including limits. Team sharing beyond a private workspace is called out as future work.
Appeal a verdict
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Appeal a verdict