solution

Make vendor selection defensible.

A preferred vendor often wins because it presented first or already sits in the stack. Argumont puts the claim on the table.

Requirements

Write what must be true before you score demos. A demo is advocacy.

Vendor claims

Treat brochure statements as claims. Ask what evidence would support them.

Evidence, risk, and cost

Implementation effort, switching cost, country of origin, and support quality belong on the score, not in a footnote.

Contract considerations

Argumont can help you list issues to take to counsel. It is not a contract review and not legal advice.

Weighted comparison

Freeze weights before you fall in love with a sales engineer.

Related pages

decision

Procurement

Vendor selection fails when the RFP theater is mistaken for evidence. Argumont compares suppliers on total cost, switching difficulty, and whether claimed capab...

decision

Vendor selection

Vendor selection is an operations and risk decision wearing a sales process. Argumont compares named vendors, including the incumbent and 'build a thin internal...

question

Which vendor?

A vendor decision is not a beauty contest among decks. It is a bet on implementation, support, price after discount, and how painful it is to leave.

question

Compare two vendors

If you score during the second demo, you are scoring charisma. Write the test first.

solution

Solutions

These pages describe kinds of work where a weak decision is expensive. They are not customer case studies. They do not invent outcomes.

Start a Decision

Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.

Start a Decision