Enterprise
Organizations need a durable record of what was considered, why a verdict was issued, who accepted it, and what happened afterward. Argumont is building that in...
core
Teams can evaluate important decisions using a consistent methodology while preserving the evidence, alternatives, approvals, and eventual outcome. The current product is a private workspace. Broader multi-player review is not live.
An account has a private workspace. Decisions, verdicts, appeals, and outcomes stay there. That is already a team-shaped artifact even if one person drives the run.
The creating account owns the workspace today. Named multi-user ownership and guest reviewers are not shipped.
You can inspect the record and run an appeal. Live commenting across many teammates is not a current feature.
Role-based team permissions are planned. Do not expect an admin console of seats and roles in the current product.
History, appeals, and accepted decisions are stored for the workspace.
You can record whether the accepted decision succeeded, failed, was partial, or is still too early.
The app Insights view is for your workspace patterns. It is not a public newsroom and not a shared org graph until that product exists.
Organizations need a durable record of what was considered, why a verdict was issued, who accepted it, and what happened afterward. Argumont is building that in...
A later adult should be able to see what was compared. Argumont stores the working record inside a private workspace, not as a public page.
People search for team decision software because they want a shared record. Argumont already keeps that record inside a workspace. Broader multi-player editing ...
Decisions may contain sensitive commercial, technical, personnel, or strategic information. Argumont is designed so decision data remains private unless you exp...
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.
Start in a workspace