Cybersecurity
Security work is a sequence of tradeoffs under incomplete information. Argumont compares remediation options against exploitability, impact, exposure, and opera...
role
Security teams need treatments, not only findings
A finding is not a decision. The decision is patch, isolate, accept, or stop. Argumont compares those treatments without pretending a verdict makes a system safe.
Scanners do not know your payment path
Exploitability on an unreachable host is not the same as a medium finding on the checkout flow. Put reachability in the evidence.
What this is not
Argumont is not a SIEM, a pentest, or an MSSP. It is a way to record why one remediation beat another this week.
Related pages
Cybersecurity
A remediation plan is a decision: what to fix first, what to accept, and which vendor actually reduces residual risk. Status green is not that analysis.
Risk analysis
Argumont treats risk as something you can score alongside other criteria. Volume of imagined disasters is not the same as residual risk after a mitigation.
For teams
These pages are for people with different incentives. A founder, a security lead, and a consultant do not need the same speech with the noun replaced.
Challenge your remediation plan
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Challenge your remediation plan