Test assumptions
A plan can look robust while resting on two unverified sentences. Argumont extracts those sentences, classifies them, and keeps them inspectable.
learn
A counterfactual is an alternate world: if churn did not fall, if the vendor missed the SLA, if the hire left in a year. You score that world too.
Causal inference uses the word technically. Decision work can use it more loosely: write the other story and see if the ranking survives.
Plans that only work if everything goes right are not plans. They are hopes with a timeline.
For each key assumption, write the false version and re-score. If the winner dies, the decision is fragile, and the record should say so.
Listing catastrophes without changing scores. Drama is not analysis.
A serious alternative should not be a rename of the preferred plan. If the ranking depends on one assumption, that belongs in the verdict.
A plan can look robust while resting on two unverified sentences. Argumont extracts those sentences, classifies them, and keeps them inspectable.
A pre-mortem asks the team to imagine it is a year later and the project is a disaster, then to write that history before you commit.
Finance uses risk-adjusted return. Operators can use the same idea without a lecture: what is the downside, how likely, and who eats it.
A risk register lists worries. A decision chooses a treatment. Argumont compares mitigation, transfer, acceptance, and avoidance with residual risk left visible...
These articles explain methods Argumont uses in the product. They are education, not a pile of keyword stubs, and not fake news with invented dates.
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and identifies the strongest decision.
Test the other world