Evidence quality
A source is not strong because it is long, famous, or recent. It is strong if it actually bears on the claim you are scoring.
question
Strength is whether it can change the claim
If removing the source would not change the status of a material claim, it was decoration.
A working test
Does it speak to this claim? Could it have come out the other way? Is the publisher in a position to know? When was it true?
How Argumont treats it
Stance and strength are recorded against the claim. Contextual background does not get promoted to proof.
Related pages
Evidence Research
Research should not merely produce links. Argumont evaluates whether a source actually supports, contradicts, or only provides context for a material claim.
Research
Research is connected to material claims, not collected as a generic reading list.
Evidence-based decisions
The phrase is used in medicine and public policy. In business it means you can point to a source when you say a number or a causal story, and you label what you...
Questions
These pages answer a search the way an operator would: what the question hides, what evidence is needed, and how to run it in Argumont.
Attach real evidence
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.
Attach real evidence