Versus a decision matrix
Weighted matrices are a classic operations tool. Argumont uses criteria and scores too. The difference is the surrounding record: claims, verification, risks, c...
compare
Software is not a partner in the room
A consulting firm can staff a project, interview stakeholders, and stay through implementation. Argumont cannot. What it can do is run a structured challenge and keep the record.
Fair praise
Good consultants bring domain scar tissue and political skill. That is not a feature we will pretend to ship as a human team.
Product difference
Argumont is on-demand analysis with inspectable scores and an appeal. It does not replace a firm you hire to change the organization.
What we are not claiming
We are not claiming consultants are obsolete. We are not publishing fake savings versus a partner day rate.
Related pages
Enterprise
Organizations need a durable record of what was considered, why a verdict was issued, who accepted it, and what happened afterward. Argumont is building that in...
How it works
Argumont turns a decision into a sequence you can inspect. Each stage leaves a record: options, claims, evidence, risks, scores, a verdict, and later an outcome...
Versus ChatGPT
ChatGPT, from OpenAI, is a general-purpose assistant that can discuss almost any topic in a conversation. That is useful. It is not the same product as a struct...
Compare
These pages describe product differences. Where we mention another company, we stick to what that product is generally for. We do not invent their pricing, benc...
See the software path
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.
See the software path