Challenge & Appeal
The initial challenger questions the proposal during analysis. Appeal is different. Appeal independently assumes the verdict itself may be wrong.
learn
A red team that reports to the author of the plan is a focus group. The job is to find the load-bearing claim and attack it.
Independent opposition with a duty to falsify, not to improve the wording of the original memo.
The Challenger works during analysis. Appeal independently assumes the verdict may be wrong. Neither is a group chat.
The initial challenger questions the proposal during analysis. Appeal is different. Appeal independently assumes the verdict itself may be wrong.
Adversarial reasoning is not being difficult in a meeting. It is assigning someone, or a model, the job of breaking the story so you do not ship a hole.
A pre-mortem asks the team to imagine it is a year later and the project is a disaster, then to write that history before you commit.
Challenge My Idea is for when you already have a preferred plan and need it tested. Argumont does not exist to decorate that plan with supportive language.
These articles explain methods Argumont uses in the product. They are a standing library on scoring, confidence, evidence, and related methods.
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.
Assign the opposition