Weighted scoring
A score without weights is a vibe with arithmetic. Weighted scoring forces you to say what matters before you fall in love with an option.
question
Weights assigned after you have a favorite are just the favorite in numeric clothing.
Name the criteria. Force a 100% total. Ask what would have to be true for a low-weight criterion to deserve more. If one weight flip reverses the verdict, write it down.
You can freeze weights. Sensitivity is a reason to keep confidence honest.
A score without weights is a vibe with arithmetic. Weighted scoring forces you to say what matters before you fall in love with an option.
Criteria should be named before options are scored. Weights should reflect the actual trade, not the slide that needs to look balanced.
Argumont creates decision-specific criteria and explicit weights rather than applying one generic scoring framework to every problem.
A matrix is a table: options as rows, criteria as columns, weights on criteria, scores in cells. The math is simple. The honesty is not.
These pages answer a search the way an operator would: what the question hides, what evidence is needed, and how to run it in Argumont.
Argumont challenges assumptions, researches evidence, compares competing approaches, and produces an inspectable verdict. You keep the final decision.
Freeze the weights