use case

Compare the candidates before you make the offer.

A hiring decision is a choice among real options: the candidates you have, a contractor, or waiting. Argumont puts that choice on one record, tests the evidence for each option, and leaves the offer with the Decision Owner.

Name the decision first

Write the role, the work you need in the first year, and the pay band. Then name the options: candidate A, candidate B, a contractor, or wait. Do this before the interviews end, so the favorite from the room does not become the only option.

Score the work, not the interview

A work sample, a result the person actually shipped, and a reference you can check are the evidence. A confident interview is a claim about that work. Inspector checks whether the claim is supported. Scout can look for public work tied to the person. The score moves when the evidence changes.

How the room runs the comparison

The Champion makes the strongest case for the leading candidate. The Challenger attacks a reason that is only charm, a job title, or a team result credited to one person. The Strategist keeps the contractor and waiting on the card.

The Judge writes the Verdict on role fit, time to contribute, and cost. The Decision Owner records the Human Decision: who receives the offer, on what conditions, or that the search waits. The Passport keeps that record for the debrief and for the later review.

Example hiring Decision

Hire candidate A, hire candidate B, use a contractor, or wait one cycle. Put the work sample next to each name. The Verdict can favor A while the Decision Owner waits for a reference. Both stay on the record.

Related pages

decision

Hiring

Most hiring debates overweight charm and underweight work samples.

decision

Employee vs contractor

The labels hide different control, cost, and lock-in. Argumont can structure the choice.

question

Which candidate?

A hire is a decision with a long tail: ramp time, team load, and the cost of being wrong. Scoring after you already like someone is not scoring.

legal

Acceptable Use

Argumont is designed to support legitimate analysis and decision-making. You may not use the service in ways that unlawfully harm people, compromise systems, vi...

hub

Use cases

A use case is the job you need done with one decision. Challenge a plan you already prefer. Compare two or more options. Research the facts you do not have. Tes...

Bring Argumont a Decision worth challenging.

Structure the question, test the evidence and the assumptions, and preserve what your organization ultimately decides.

Start a Decision